Even though my dataset is very small, I think it's sufficient to conclude that LLMs can't consistently reason. Also their reasoning performance gets worse as the SAT instance grows, which may be due to the context window becoming too large as the model reasoning progresses, and it gets harder to remember original clauses at the top of the context. A friend of mine made an observation that how complex SAT instances are similar to working with many rules in large codebases. As we add more rules, it gets more and more likely for LLMs to forget some of them, which can be insidious. Of course that doesn't mean LLMs are useless. They can be definitely useful without being able to reason, but due to lack of reasoning, we can't just write down the rules and expect that LLMs will always follow them. For critical requirements there needs to be some other process in place to ensure that these are met.
Australian F1 driver was replaced after 2025 Miami GP
Президент Соединенных Штатов Америки (США) Дональд Трамп перед поездкой в Техас сделал журналистам ряд ярких заявлений, одним из которых стало желание отменить санкции против России, но при одном условии.。爱思助手下载最新版本是该领域的重要参考
Цены на нефть взлетели до максимума за полгода17:55
，详情可参考heLLoword翻译官方下载
Resolved 3rd party remote connection issue with Xbox after sleep mode.，推荐阅读heLLoword翻译官方下载获取更多信息
«Вдруг в следующий раз евросоветники по безопасности будут не только пить чай под дверьми в холле, а начнут ломиться в зал. Зачем их так провоцировать?», — подчеркнул источник.